Teen Hackers Deny Charges in Major TfL Cyber Attack that Caused £39 Million in Damage | News | london-news-net.preview-domain.com

Teen Hackers Deny Charges in Major TfL Cyber Attack that Caused £39 Million in Damage

Teen Hackers Deny Charges in Major TfL Cyber Attack that Caused £39 Million in Damage

Two individuals in their teenage years, accused of involvement in a hacking incident targeting Transport for London’s computer systems, have both entered not guilty pleas to the charges of computer hacking at Southwark Crown Court.

Nineteen-year-old Thalha Jubair, hailing from East London, and eighteen-year-old Owen Flowers from Walsall in the West Midlands, spoke solely to confirm their identities and present their pleas during the short session.

They face charges of conspiring to engage in unauthorized activities against Transport for London (TfL) in violation of the Computer Misuse Act.

Additionally, Mr. Flowers is also charged with attempting to breach the computer networks of Sutter Health, a California-based organization, and another US entity, SSM Healthcare Corporation.

Mr. Jubair faces a further allegation of not providing passwords for his electronic devices.

TfL reported that the hacking incident resulted in £39 million worth of damages and led to a three-month disruption of its services in the autumn of 2024.

Although transport operations remained functional, various online services and information displays managed by TfL were taken offline as a result of the attack.

As a precaution, TfL had to notify thousands of customers about potential unauthorized access to sensitive personal information, including bank account numbers and sort codes.

Compromised data included names, email addresses, and residential addresses.

Judge Christopher Hehir has scheduled the trial to commence on June 8 of next year, with proceedings anticipated to last between four and six weeks.

Both defendants remain in custody pending trial.

Related posts

Regulator backtracks on ghost train plan Текст: Plans to ban passengers from a peak morning train service between Manchester and London have been abandoned after a U-turn by a government regulator. The Office of Road and Rail (ORR) reversed its decision to run the 07:00 GMT Avanti West Coast service from Manchester Piccadilly to London Euston without passengers after a public backlash. On Sunday,the ORR announced only staff would be on boardas of mid-December – citing concerns that allowing passengers to get on would harm the overall performance of the line. But just over 24 hours later, an ORR spokesperson said after listening to feedback it would give Network Rail and Avanti permission to continue running the service with passengers. On the basis of the information we have, we believe the running of this 7am service could have a negative impact on reliability and punctuality of services on the West Coast Main Line, but we recognise its importance and popularity and will support its continued operation, the ORR spokesperson continued. In light of the U-turn Avanti West Coast has said it is delighted that the Office of Rail and Road has given permission to reinstate the 07:00 Manchester to Euston weekday service in their December timetable. The original decision would have had a detrimental impact on customers who use this train and this development is a welcome boost for those who want to take advantage of a sub two-hour service between two of the UKs major cities, A spokesperson for Avanti West Coast said. The ORR has confirmed the U-turn only relates to the 07:00 GMT Manchester Piccadilly to London Euston service. It said the following services would not be running: 12:52 GMT: Blackpool North – London Euston (Monday to Friday) 09:39 GMT: London Euston – Blackpool North (Monday to Friday) 19:32 GMT: Chester – London Euston (Monday to Friday) 17:53 GMT: Holyhead – London Euston terminates at Crewe (Sunday)

rimmaruslan98@gmail.com

Headline: Local Garden Centre Closure Leaves Learning Disabled Volunteers Heartbroken as Community Fights to Save Lifeline

Navigating Homeownership: The Struggles of Disabled Buyers in a System Designed for the Non-Disabled

rimmaruslan98@gmail.com

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More