From Ruin to Revival: Historic Georgian Mansion Set for Remarkable Restoration After Unlawful Works | News | london-news-net.preview-domain.com

From Ruin to Revival: Historic Georgian Mansion Set for Remarkable Restoration After Unlawful Works

From Ruin to Revival: Historic Georgian Mansion Set for Remarkable Restoration After Unlawful Works

A Grade II listed structure from the 17th century in north-west London is poised for restoration after the owner’s previous renovations left it “literally stripped”.

The planning committee of Harrow Council has approved a comprehensive plan for the restoration of The Rookery, a Georgian mansion and stable complex located in Stanmore.

Originally constructed for Lord Clutterbuck, the proprietor of the nearby Clutterbuck Brewery, the property has been retained by the same family for multiple generations.

Recently, a series of “unauthorized modifications” have been reported to the committee, including the use of inauthentic décor labeled as “fake old” and the removal of original plaster from the walls, which has adversely impacted the listed building.

In 2022, a new owner acquired The Rookery, but they failed to secure Listed Building Consent before initiating changes.

Conservationists intervened in December of that year to halt the ongoing renovation, which has not resumed since, according to reports from the Local Democracy Reporting Service.

Approval has now been granted for both internal and external modifications, encompassing a thorough interior “strip out” – most of which has already occurred – and updates to the décor.

The plans specify that the restoration will aim to “match the historical details” and “revive the historical features” where they can be accurately recreated, according to a planning officer from Harrow Council.

The Rookery is recognized for its significant historical and architectural value due to its age, its connection to the brewery, and its traditional design elements and historical materials.

The planning officer noted that the restoration could offer a “unique opportunity” to gain insights into the building’s significance and historical evolution as contemporary surfaces are removed.

When asked about the possibility of returning the building to its original condition, the planning officer affirmed that it represents “the best proposal at the stage we are currently in.”

No enforcement actions were taken when the alterations were discovered, as officers aimed to gain a clearer understanding of the extent of the changes. However, the option for prosecution remains on the table, according to committee chair Marilyn Ashton.

She described the application as a “positive” step toward progress but lamented the building’s current state as “a significant letdown,” adding that “acknowledging what has occurred and adopting a practical perspective does not rectify the situation.”

“Upon thoroughly reviewing the report, one might deduce that we still retain the possibility of prosecution because the damage inflicted on a Grade II listed building is quite severe. This isn’t merely a single room or a minor feature; the entire structure has essentially been stripped bare.”

She concluded by expressing hope that while “not much remains of its historical significance,” efforts could still be made to restore some of its former appearance.

Related posts

Groundbreaking Time-Lapse Footage Sheds Light on Early Heart Development in Mouse Embryos

Headline: Cabinet Office to Undergo Major Overhaul: 1,200 Job Cuts and Shift towards Digital Efficiency Ahead

More flats have fire safety defects, brigade warns Текст: Hundreds of blocks of flats in London still have serious fire safety defects, according to new figures from the London Fire Brigade (LFB). More than 1,400 buildings have simultaneous evacuation plans should a fire break out in the block, indicating that they are unsafe for residents to stay put. Stay put – which was theinitial advice for Grenfell towerand which remains the fire policy in most high-rise buildings – relies on a building being properly constructed. Regulations should prevent fire spreading from one flat to another for at least 60 minutes. Edward Daffarn, of Grenfell United, said the latest figures showed that Londoners were still going to sleep in buildings that arent safe. Seventy-two people died in the Grenfell fire in north Kensington on 14 June 2017. Since then, the safety of high-rise homes across the capital has been brought into focus, with the LFB checking cladding, fire doors, windows and the compartmentation of flats. The LFB said the number of buildings with simultaneous evacuation guidance in place had risen following its most recent count to 1,448. There are 883 buildings more than 26ft (18m) tall on the evacuation list, and 565 buildings under 26ft (18m) on the list. Mr Daffarn escaped from the 16th floor of Grenfell. He said: Eight years ago, standing underneath the burning wreckage of Grenfell Tower, I was convinced it would be the catalyst for societal change; that something so awful, which resulted in the horrific loss of 72 lives, could not happen without things changing. And yet we sit here eight years later and people are still going to sleep in buildings that arent safe. We need to create a legacy for Grenfell that means that people that live in social housing, people that live in high-rise blocks, are treated with respect and live in safe buildings. Sharing his own opinion, and acknowledging the difficulty others feel in seeing the tower regularly, Mr Daffarn added: I think the anniversary is made all the more poignant by the fact that this is the last time that we will meet with the tower in situ. We havent got justice yet. It feels wrong to bepulling the tower downwhile so much remains unresolved. Mr Daffarn is hopeful a new documentary about the fire, due to air on Netflix next week, will spur government efforts to take action. He said: It needs to put pressure on the government to ensure that the companies involved are not able to access public funding, and Im hoping that this documentary will accelerate that process. The Cabinet Office confirmed in February seven companies were facing possible bans – cladding firm Arconic, insulation firm Kingspan, former Celotex owners Saint-Gobain, fire inspectors Exova, design and build contractor Rydon, architect Studio E and subcontractor Harley Facades. It is understood investigations were launched into all of them in March, looking into whether any engaged in professional misconduct for the purposes of the Procurement Act 2023, potentially leading them to be debarred from public contracts. No timeline has been given for how long it might be before the outcomes are known. Bereaved and survivors have long campaigned for criminal charges to be brought over the disaster. Police and prosecutors have previously said investigators would need until the end of 2025 to complete their inquiry, with final decisions on potential criminal charges by the end of 2026. The near 10-year wait for justice has beendescribed by families as unbearable. A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: [We] have been clear that the pace of remediation has been too slow for too long. Thats why we are taking decisive action through our Remediation Acceleration Plan to fix unsafe buildings by 2029 faster, while we continue to support residents and identify buildings at risk. Additional reporting by PA Media


This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More