New Evidence Links Ransomware Attack to NHS Patient Fatality, Highlighting Cybersecurity Risks in Healthcare | News | london-news-net.preview-domain.com

New Evidence Links Ransomware Attack to NHS Patient Fatality, Highlighting Cybersecurity Risks in Healthcare

New Evidence Links Ransomware Attack to NHS Patient Fatality, Highlighting Cybersecurity Risks in Healthcare

A ransomware attack targeting NHS blood services in London hospitals and GP clinics last June has been associated with the death of an individual.

King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust announced that one patient had “died unexpectedly” amidst the Russian cyber attack on June 3, 2024, which resulted in over 10,000 appointments being canceled.

A representative for the trust indicated that various factors contributed to the patient’s death, including “an extended delay in obtaining blood test results.”

The attack resulted in the theft of patient data managed by Synnovis, an organization responsible for laboratory services for NHS trusts and GPs in southeast London.

The trust’s spokesperson remarked that a thorough evaluation of the patient’s care had been conducted.

“The investigation into this patient safety incident uncovered several factors that contributed to the death,” they stated.

“This included a prolonged wait for blood test results due to the cyber assault impacting pathology services at that time.

“We have met with the family of the deceased and provided them with the findings of our safety investigation.”

The spokesperson also noted they were unable to disclose the date of the patient’s passing or their age, citing privacy concerns.

Mark Dollar, Synnovis’ chief executive, expressed sorrow over the revelation that last year’s cyber attack was identified as a contributing factor to the patient’s death.

“Our condolences go out to the family affected by this tragedy.”

More than 10,000 appointments were cancelled across the two London NHS trusts that were hit hardest; numerous GP practices in the area were also unable to process blood tests for their patients.

The Health Service Journal (HSJ) reported nearly 600 “incidents” associated with the attack, impacting patient care in 170 cases. One incident resulted in “severe” harm, while 14 cases led to “moderate” harm, with the rest categorized as “low harm,” according to HSJ.

NHS guidelines define severe harm as occurring when patients experience permanent injury, require life-saving treatment, or could potentially have their life expectancy reduced, among other criteria.

Deryck Mitchelson from cyber security company Check Point stated that these cyber attacks represented more than mere “disruption” as they resulted in “patient harm.”

Mitchelson, who previously served as the director of National Digital and chief information security officer for NHS National Services Scotland, emphasized that IT systems’ security is only as robust as its weakest link.

“The confirmed death is tragic, yet not unexpected. When the systems that support diagnostics and treatment are compromised on such a large scale, the repercussions are far from theoretical. This is the tangible cost we face,” he explained.

“This act was not faceless. It was not just systems or data that were targeted — it was care. Human lives were at stake, and one has been lost. This reality should carry significant weight.”

Additional reporting contributed by Chris Vallance, BBC Technology.

Related posts

Public Inquiry Reveals Alarming Intrusiveness of Digital Monitoring in Mental Health Care

rimmaruslan98@gmail.com

More flats have fire safety defects, brigade warns Текст: Hundreds of blocks of flats in London still have serious fire safety defects, according to new figures from the London Fire Brigade (LFB). More than 1,400 buildings have simultaneous evacuation plans should a fire break out in the block, indicating that they are unsafe for residents to stay put. Stay put – which was theinitial advice for Grenfell towerand which remains the fire policy in most high-rise buildings – relies on a building being properly constructed. Regulations should prevent fire spreading from one flat to another for at least 60 minutes. Edward Daffarn, of Grenfell United, said the latest figures showed that Londoners were still going to sleep in buildings that arent safe. Seventy-two people died in the Grenfell fire in north Kensington on 14 June 2017. Since then, the safety of high-rise homes across the capital has been brought into focus, with the LFB checking cladding, fire doors, windows and the compartmentation of flats. The LFB said the number of buildings with simultaneous evacuation guidance in place had risen following its most recent count to 1,448. There are 883 buildings more than 26ft (18m) tall on the evacuation list, and 565 buildings under 26ft (18m) on the list. Mr Daffarn escaped from the 16th floor of Grenfell. He said: Eight years ago, standing underneath the burning wreckage of Grenfell Tower, I was convinced it would be the catalyst for societal change; that something so awful, which resulted in the horrific loss of 72 lives, could not happen without things changing. And yet we sit here eight years later and people are still going to sleep in buildings that arent safe. We need to create a legacy for Grenfell that means that people that live in social housing, people that live in high-rise blocks, are treated with respect and live in safe buildings. Sharing his own opinion, and acknowledging the difficulty others feel in seeing the tower regularly, Mr Daffarn added: I think the anniversary is made all the more poignant by the fact that this is the last time that we will meet with the tower in situ. We havent got justice yet. It feels wrong to bepulling the tower downwhile so much remains unresolved. Mr Daffarn is hopeful a new documentary about the fire, due to air on Netflix next week, will spur government efforts to take action. He said: It needs to put pressure on the government to ensure that the companies involved are not able to access public funding, and Im hoping that this documentary will accelerate that process. The Cabinet Office confirmed in February seven companies were facing possible bans – cladding firm Arconic, insulation firm Kingspan, former Celotex owners Saint-Gobain, fire inspectors Exova, design and build contractor Rydon, architect Studio E and subcontractor Harley Facades. It is understood investigations were launched into all of them in March, looking into whether any engaged in professional misconduct for the purposes of the Procurement Act 2023, potentially leading them to be debarred from public contracts. No timeline has been given for how long it might be before the outcomes are known. Bereaved and survivors have long campaigned for criminal charges to be brought over the disaster. Police and prosecutors have previously said investigators would need until the end of 2025 to complete their inquiry, with final decisions on potential criminal charges by the end of 2026. The near 10-year wait for justice has beendescribed by families as unbearable. A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: [We] have been clear that the pace of remediation has been too slow for too long. Thats why we are taking decisive action through our Remediation Acceleration Plan to fix unsafe buildings by 2029 faster, while we continue to support residents and identify buildings at risk. Additional reporting by PA Media

Headline: Massive Protests Planned for Trump’s UK Visit, Promising a Joyful Defiance Against His Policies


This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More