Transport for London (TfL) officials have acknowledged that additional bus lanes and Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) have contributed to increased traffic congestion in certain areas of the capital.

The organization has been moving away from policies that prioritize private vehicle use, with the broader objective of ensuring that by 2041, 80% of trips in London are made by walking, cycling, or public transport.

This strategy includes reallocating road space for new bus lanes and establishing LTNs.

Additionally, initiatives like the Ultra Low Emission Zone (Ulez) fee and the Congestion Charge Zone (CCZ) are part of the city’s efforts to lessen dependence on cars in London.

LTNs seek to decrease vehicular traffic in residential neighborhoods by employing cameras, planters, or lockable bollards.

The goal of London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan to achieve net-zero emissions by 2030 hinges on a 27% drop in car travel.

Officials contend that increased usage of buses, trains, and bike lanes will result in reduced congestion and quicker journeys for those who must use a private vehicle for work or accessibility purposes.

However, the effectiveness of these measures has been called into question, especially as bus speeds decline and London ranks as one of the slowest major cities for driving.

On Wednesday, TfL officials confessed to the London Assembly’s transport committee that the rollout of approximately 100 LTNs, primarily during the Covid pandemic, has led to greater congestion in certain areas.

Carl Eddleston, TfL’s director of streets and network operations, remarked that while LTNs “offer considerable safety and promote active travel,” he noted, “Most of them are implemented on borough roads, so they aren’t solely a TfL choice.”

He acknowledged, “In some areas, these have contributed to local congestion, yet nearly all of them have been very successful. We must continue to review them actively – there has been significant community engagement and adjustments made to the LTNs.”