U.S. Unveils Alternative Security Framework for Ukraine Amid NATO Discussions | World | london-news-net.preview-domain.com

U.S. Unveils Alternative Security Framework for Ukraine Amid NATO Discussions

U.S. Unveils Alternative Security Framework for Ukraine Amid NATO Discussions

The United States has suggested security assurances for Ukraine that are akin to, but distinct from, NATO’s collective defense agreement, according to Italy’s Prime Minister and a diplomatic source on Saturday.

This proposal emerged during a call between U.S. President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and various European leaders, which took place following Trump’s summit with Russia’s Vladimir Putin.

“Among the security assurances proposed for Ukraine is a guarantee resembling a non-NATO Article 5 agreement, reportedly discussed with Putin,” the diplomatic source informed AFP, insisting on anonymity.

NATO’s collective defense hinges on Article 5: an attack on one member triggers a unified response from the entire alliance.

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who participated in the call with Trump, confirmed that the U.S. president mentioned the idea of a security guarantee “inspired” by Article 5, something she has advocated for over several months.

The proposal aims to establish a collective security clause “that would enable Ukraine to receive support from all its partners, including the U.S., which would be prepared to respond if Ukraine faces another attack,” Meloni stated.

In March, Meloni told Italian senators that any retaliatory response would not necessarily mean going to war.

She emphasized that while NATO’s Article 5 permits military action, “this is not the sole possible response.”

Ukraine has long sought NATO membership; however, Russia has cited this desire as a justification for its invasion, and there is some hesitance among Western nations regarding this prospect.

Trump has consistently dismissed the notion of Ukraine joining the military alliance.

Prior to the joint call with Zelensky and European leaders, Trump had a discussion solely with the Ukrainian president about the Alaska summit that took place on Friday.

“The American side presented this [joint security proposal] during its dialogue with President Zelensky and reiterated it in the conversation with the European leaders,” the diplomatic source mentioned.

Another informant familiar with the situation confirmed that the NATO-like guarantees were brought to the table.

However, this informant expressed skepticism: “No one understands how this would function or why Putin would agree to such terms when he is fundamentally opposed to NATO and clearly against robust guarantees for Ukraine’s sovereignty.”

Meloni’s remarks did not clarify whether this idea was shared with Putin.

Zelensky is scheduled to visit Washington on Monday for discussions with Trump.

The second informant indicated that Zelensky plans to address the potential format of a summit involving Trump, Putin, and himself, alongside the role of Ukraine’s European allies in peace negotiations, territorial issues, and security assurances.

Related posts

Culinary Historian Pavel Syutkin Faces Criminal Charges for Challenging Russian Military Narratives

Telegrams Security Dilemma: The Dark Ties to Russian Intelligence Revealed

Russia Blacklists Human Rights Watch as ‘Undesirable’ Текст: Russia’s Justice Ministry on FridaydesignatedHuman Rights Watch as an “undesirable” organization. The designation bans the U.S.-headquartered nonprofit from operating in Russia. Under Russian law, individuals found to be affiliated with “undesirable” organizations face up to four years in prison, while organization leaders risk up to six years. In an interview, the influential body said it was not surprised by the designation and vowed to continue its work remotely. We are actually going to work even harder to expose the staggering crackdown by the Kremlin on Russian civil society and to report on Russian crimes in Ukraine, Tanya Lokshina, senior associate director of the groups Europe and Central Asia division, told AFP. HRW was among a number of international organizations and foreign NGOs whose local offices Russian authoritiesshut downin the first months of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine over alleged legal violations. Russia’s Prosecutor General’s Office, which usually announces “undesirable” designations, has not issued any statement on HRW’s blacklisting. Founded in 1978 and with a presence in more than 90 countries, HRW has documented human rights violations in Russia for around 30 years. It hasaccusedthe Russian military of committing war crimes in Ukraine. Russia introduced its “undesirable” law in 2015, using it to crack down on independent media, opposition groups and foreign organizations. Hundreds of organizations are currently blacklisted, including The Moscow Times. AFP contributed reporting.

rimmaruslan98@gmail.com

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More