Dutch Supreme Courts Landmark Ruling Upholds $50 Billion Yukos Compensation Award | World | london-news-net.preview-domain.com

Dutch Supreme Courts Landmark Ruling Upholds $50 Billion Yukos Compensation Award

Dutch Supreme Courts Landmark Ruling Upholds $50 Billion Yukos Compensation Award

A landmark payment of $50 billion from Russia to the former shareholders of the defunct Yukos oil company remains valid following a ruling by the Dutch Supreme Court that dismissed a Russian appeal on Friday, concluding a protracted legal dispute.

This decision brings closure to the prolonged conflict surrounding Yukos, which was dismantled in the early 2000s following the arrest of its billionaire owner and outspoken Kremlin opponent, Mikhail Khodorkovsky.

In its written decision released on Friday, the court stated, “The Supreme Court dismisses the appeal [and] orders the Russian Federation to bear the costs of the appeal proceedings.”

Yukos was once the largest oil company in Russia, created in the wake of the Soviet Union’s dissolution in the 1990s, when entrepreneurs like Khodorkovsky acquired assets at extremely low prices.

Khodorkovsky became an outspoken critic of President Vladimir Putin and was apprehended in 2003.

Following his arrest, the Kremlin imposed a tax liability of approximately $27 billion on Yukos, leading to the company’s liquidation in 2006.

While Khodorkovsky, who spent ten years imprisoned and now lives in exile, is not involved in this case, former majority shareholders of Yukos sought compensation from Russia.

They brought their case to the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) located in The Hague.

In 2014, after nine years of proceedings, the PCA ruled in favor of the shareholders, granting them $50 billion, which is considered the highest arbitration award in the world.

This was followed by multiple appeals and counter-appeals.

In a surprising turn in 2016, a local Dutch court upheld a Russian appeal, determining that the PCA did not have jurisdiction to award compensation to shareholders.

However, the Dutch appeals court subsequently overturned that ruling, reinstating the compensation for the shareholders.

Russia then escalated the case to the Dutch Supreme Court, which remanded it back to the Amsterdam Court of Appeals. There, judges reviewed the case anew and reaffirmed that the $50 billion award should remain intact.

Friday’s ruling represented Moscow’s further appeal to the Supreme Court, effectively signaling that the case should now conclude.

Tim Osborne, a representative from the GML group advocating for the shareholders, characterized the decision as “transformative” and “a landmark victory.”

He added that it “reinforces the essential legal principle that no nation — even a rogue state like Russia — is above the law.”

Related posts

Shlosberg Placed Under House Arrest Pending Trial Текст: A court in the northwestern city of Pskov has placed opposition politician Lev Shlosberg under house arrest pending trial on charges of “discrediting” the Russian military, independent media reported Wednesday. Shlosberg, a senior member of the liberal party Yabloko, wasarrested and chargedwith Russia’s wartime censorship offense on Tuesday. On Wednesday, the Pskov City CourtorderedShlosberg to be placed under house arrest until Aug. 8, according to independent outlets RusNews and Sotavision. The hearing was held behindclosed doorsat the plaintiffs’ request. Yablokosaidparty chairman Nikolai Rybakov was present to support Shlosberg. Authorities accuse Shlosberg, who has remained in Russia despite his opposition to the war, of calling for a ceasefire in Ukraine during a debate with historian Yury Pivovarov in January. A video of that debate was published on the Russian social media website Odnoklassniki. In January, law enforcement authorities pressed criminalchargesagainst Shlosberg for failing to comply with Russia’s “foreign agent” law. He could face up to two years in prison if convicted of those charges. Shlosberg, who used to head Yabloko’s Pskov region branch, regularly condemns Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, having called it a “tragedy” on social media. Some exiled opposition figures have criticized Shlosberg for not taking a harder line against the war. Russia’s Justice Ministrylabeledthe opposition politician a “foreign agent” in June 2023. Under the “foreign agent” law, individuals must include a lengthy disclaimer on all of their public statements, including social media posts.

Drone Targets Russian Trade Mission in Sweden, Embassy Claims Vandalism Threats

Three Ura.ru Journalists Detained Amid Controversial Leak Inquiry


This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More