Corruption Crackdown: Two Arrested in Barking and Dagenham Council Housing Fraud Probe | News | london-news-net.preview-domain.com

Corruption Crackdown: Two Arrested in Barking and Dagenham Council Housing Fraud Probe

Corruption Crackdown: Two Arrested in Barking and Dagenham Council Housing Fraud Probe

The City of London Police has apprehended two individuals in connection with alleged corruption within the housing department of Barking and Dagenham Council.

As part of an inquiry into suspected housing fraud related to the council, the force’s domestic corruption unit executed “multiple warrants” in Dagenham, in east London, and Essex.

The investigation is focused on the distribution of several hundred council properties that took place from November 2020 to December 2024.

Following the execution of five warrants on Thursday, both Barking and Dagenham Council and its fully-owned housing entity, BD Reside, announced their cooperation with police in relation to the suspected housing fraud case.

The City of London Police stated: “Potential tenants responded to social media advertisements and received instructions on how to secure affordable housing in the Barking and Dagenham areas.”

The police reported that prospective tenants “paid fraudsters ‘finder’s fees’ and excessive rents.”

Individuals who believe they may have been affected are encouraged to come forward and fill out a questionnaire as part of the investigation.

Dominic Twomey, leader of the council and Labour councillor, remarked: “We now await further developments as the investigation progresses, but I urge anyone who possesses any information that could be beneficial—regardless of how minor or insignificant it may appear—to step forward.”

Related posts

Headline: Government Unveils Ambitious £39bn Plan to Build 300,000 New Homes, Tackling Londons Acute Housing Emergency

Local Council Faces Legal Challenge Over Transgender Colours on Road Crossings: A Clash of Rights and Public Messaging

Councils repair delays blamed for ceiling collapse Текст: A man in north London was left with a collapsed ceiling after Camden Council took too long to fix a leak coming from the flat above, a Housing Ombudsman investigation has found. The watchdog criticised the council for failing to stop water coming from the upstairs property, which it owns, despite several warnings and more than 10 repair attempts. Ombudsman Richard Blakeway said there was no evidence the council had considered enforcement action, even though its staff were unable to gain access to the upstairs flat on seven occasions. A council spokesperson apologised for the distress and disruption caused, and said the local authority should have acted more quickly. The report found the council twice marked the job as complete without confirming whether the leak had been resolved. The resident living below repeatedly tried to send photos of the damage to the council via its repairs WhatsApp account, but it was not working. The council phoned the neighbour, received no answer and did not follow up, the watchdog said. Attempts to fix the problem were then repeatedly delayed because workers could not get into the upstairs property. Eventually, the ceiling collapsed. The watchdog said Camden Councils delays were to blame. The council said it had changed how it managed complex repairs, including bringing in specialist contractors earlier if in-house teams cannot identify the cause. Mr Blakeways report also said the affected resident had remained in temporary accommodation even by the time the watchdog finished its investigation and upheld his complaint. The council said new follow-up procedures had since been introduced to monitor people placed in temporary accommodation because of repair problems. The ombudsmans wider report also criticised several other London councils, including Ealing, Harrow, Lambeth and Tower Hamlets, along with multiple housing associations. Mr Blakeway highlighted a case involving Islington and Shoreditch Housing Association (ISHA), where it took more than three years to repair a leak in a leaseholders home. There was an eight-month gap between the initial complaint and the start of works. The watchdog said the resident was ignored while woodwork in her flat deteriorated. When ISHA did respond, it gave no explanation for the delays or when repairs would begin. The landlord initially offered to replace the rotting window and door, but later withdrew the offer and advised the resident to claim on her contents insurance. A spokesperson for ISHA said it had apologised and that the case was absolutely not the standard or experience we want for our residents. The housing association said it had since put in more resources to its repairs and surveys team along with new structures and processes.

rimmaruslan98@gmail.com

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More