Metropolitan Police Staff Ready to Vote on Strike Amidst Pay Inequality Claims | News | london-news-net.preview-domain.com

Metropolitan Police Staff Ready to Vote on Strike Amidst Pay Inequality Claims

Metropolitan Police Staff Ready to Vote on Strike Amidst Pay Inequality Claims

Staff members of the Metropolitan Police are set to vote on potential strike action amid a pay dispute, with a union arguing that civilian employees in the Met are regarded as “second-class citizens.”

The Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union announced that around 6,500 of its members will participate in the upcoming ballot to decide whether to initiate a campaign of industrial action.

The union contends that its members have been denied a £1,250 London allowance awarded to police officers, labeling it a “symbol of inequality within the Met.”

The Met Police has been contacted for a response.

Fran Heathcote, general secretary of the PCS union, stated: “While management advocates for a unified ‘One Met’, police staff continually face discrimination regarding pay, advancement, and job stability.

“Officers benefit from the allowance and complimentary travel, while numerous dedicated members supporting them find it difficult to make ends meet in one of the world’s priciest cities.

“It is time to turn the concept of ‘One Met’ from mere words into tangible action, fostering a work environment that ensures fairness, equality, and respect for everyone.”

Related posts

Tributes Flow for Talented Young Footballer Izaiah Smith Following Tragic Lake Incident

London Mayor Unveils £300k Initiative to Transform Outdoor Dining Experience as Summer Approaches

Council identifies potential sites for travellers Текст: Islington Council has proposed nine potential travellers sites after years of failed attempts to secure suitable land. The plan, which could provide up to 13 permanent pitches in the borough, has been welcomed by campaigners, though is likely to face local opposition. Under the Housing Act 2004, local authorities have to identify and meet the accommodation needs of Gypsies and Travellers. The council began its search for suitable sites for the community several years ago but until now has been unsuccessful in finding or delivering culturally appropriate land in the borough. Philomena Mongan, a Hackney-based Irish Traveller advocating for the community, told theLocal Democracy Reporting Servicefamilies were very happy to see the new sites put forward for consultation. Although she believes the sites are small, she praised the council for pushing for them to be delivered. But she also shared her dismay that the plans had provoked a backlash, including responses that were removed from the official consultation report because of discriminatory remarks. Ms Mongan said: They dont realise these families have a lot of history in Islington and have been there a long time. In 2019, a review commissioned by the council found most of Islingtons Gypsy and Traveller community had lived in the borough for years, with some households having arrived in the 1970s in caravans and intermittently pulling up there for a time. But as these communities found it harder to travel this way, some have opted to move into brick-and-mortar housing. Nancy Hawker, policy officer at London Gypsies and Travellers (LGT), said these families in the borough were desperate for pitches and blamed the failure to find suitable land earlier on extensive campaigning against the councils proposals by those objecting it. Over 250 sites in the borough were considered before a shortlist of nine was drawn up, which includes land on housing estates such as Aubert Court and Mayville, as well as Pleasant Place Garden. Some local residents who took part in an earlier engagement asked the council to look at available sites outside of Islington, arguing that the borough was already too densely-populated. Others called for robust evidence that the Gypsy and Traveller community have lived in the borough for more than five years. The council said there would not be a public meeting to discuss the proposal because of the potential for hostile or discriminatory comments and opinions to be expressed. Instead, residents are asked to submit comments online in a consultation which is set to run until next month.

rimmaruslan98@gmail.com

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More