The warm weather of summer revitalizes Croydon town centre, fostering a vibrant and upbeat ambiance. Nevertheless, many observe a distinct shift in the atmosphere as night falls.

Local shop owners report a need to employ additional security measures to deter theft and highlight the prevalence of gang-related drug crime.

For the first time in London, the Metropolitan Police are deploying live facial recognition (LFR) technology by installing fixed cameras in Croydon as they search for suspects.

While authorities assert that this technology will enhance street safety, Big Brother Watch expresses concerns about the extensive nature of the surveillance.

The LFR cameras perform real-time facial scans to assist police in identifying wanted individuals.

In March, the Met revealed plans to set up fixed facial recognition cameras along North End and London Road in Croydon, following previous trials with mobile units.

These fixed LFR cameras resemble standard CCTV systems but will be activated solely during technology use, according to the Met.

Mobile LFR has already functioned in various London boroughs, including during the 2023 King’s Coronation.

According to the Met, the use of this technology has led to over 1,000 arrests across London, including 93 registered sex offenders and multiple individuals violating court orders.

This year alone, LFR has scanned approximately 1.5 million faces in London, resulting in 459 arrests, or about one arrest for every 3,300 scans, although over half of the so-called “true matches” did not lead to arrests.

Lindsey Chiswick, the head of the Met’s facial recognition initiative, stated: “This technology is improving safety in London by taking dangerous offenders off the streets, thereby saving officers time and providing quicker, more precise outcomes.”

Shopkeeper Mohammed Kamzi sees the introduction of live facial recognition cameras as a positive step, although he harbors some apprehensions.

Having worked on North End for four years, he has noticed a surge in crime and a decrease in police presence.

“In the morning, we can manage with two staff members,” he noted, owning U Fone. “But after 4 p.m., it changes. We need three or four employees—one to chase thieves and another to monitor the shop.”

“We witness crime here frequently,” he added.

While he acknowledges the safety advantages of LFR cameras, he senses that some customers feel uneasy: “They seem anxious, as if they’ve done something wrong.”

Local resident Shane Barrett sees potential benefits from the technology, yet questions the locations chosen for camera installation.

“Croydon’s situation is deteriorating, with stabbings occurring every couple of weeks. The cameras might help, but the stabbings typically happen on side streets and around Surrey Street, not North End,” he commented.

Shopper Helen Matthews expressed a desire for better communication from the police: “I can see it being beneficial, but we lack clarity on how it operates and when it’ll be activated.”

Civil liberties organizations also raise significant concerns.

Madeleine Stone, a senior advocacy officer with Big Brother Watch, warned that the new cameras could create “a chilling and dystopian environment on the high street.”

Charlie Whelton from the human rights group Liberty criticized the lack of proper legal oversight for the technology. He described the situation as “a regulatory wild west.”

Mr. Whelton cautioned that there is currently no comprehensive legislation regulating its nationwide use, leaving the cameras available to surveil anyone.

The Met insists it has implemented stringent safeguards.

They claim that biometric data is permanently discarded if an individual is not on the watchlist and noted that independent testing by the National Physical Laboratory demonstrated the system’s accuracy without significant racial or gender bias.

A spokesperson for the Met stated: “We’re dedicated to enhancing safety in London through targeted use of technology against the most hazardous offenders.

We are actively engaging with the community to clarify how the technology functions and to assure the public that robust privacy protections are in place.”