Protest Escalates: Man Pleads Guilty to Assaulting Quran-Burning Activist Outside Turkish Consulate | News | london-news-net.preview-domain.com

Protest Escalates: Man Pleads Guilty to Assaulting Quran-Burning Activist Outside Turkish Consulate

Protest Escalates: Man Pleads Guilty to Assaulting Quran-Burning Activist Outside Turkish Consulate

A man has confessed to assaulting an individual who set fire to a copy of the Quran outside the Turkish Consulate in central London.

Moussa Kadri, 59, a resident of Kensington and Chelsea, pleaded guilty at Westminster Magistrates’ Court to the assault on Hamit Coskun but denied the charge of possessing a knife during the incident that took place on 13 February in Rutland Gardens, Knightsbridge.

Mr. Coskun, 50, from Derby, has previously contested a count of harassment motivated by religious beliefs.

During the court proceedings, prosecutor Kathryn Hughes informed the court that Kadri exited a nearby building wielding a large bread knife and attacked Mr. Coskun, who was reportedly burning the Quran as part of a protest.

The possession of a bladed item carries a potential maximum penalty of four years in prison. The case has been referred to Southwark Crown Court, where Kadri will face trial for the alleged possession charge and will be sentenced for the assault next month.

He has been granted conditional bail, which includes a stipulation not to contact Mr. Coskun directly.

Kadri only provided his name and address and entered his pleas during the hearing.

Mr. Coskun is scheduled to appear for trial at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 28 May.

Related posts

London Fills Life-Saving Gaps: 200 New Defibrillators Combat Desert Areas

rimmaruslan98@gmail.com

Historic Greenwich Pub Triumphs in Battle to Preserve Riverside Seating Amid Council Scrutiny

rimmaruslan98@gmail.com

Councils repair delays blamed for ceiling collapse Текст: A man in north London was left with a collapsed ceiling after Camden Council took too long to fix a leak coming from the flat above, a Housing Ombudsman investigation has found. The watchdog criticised the council for failing to stop water coming from the upstairs property, which it owns, despite several warnings and more than 10 repair attempts. Ombudsman Richard Blakeway said there was no evidence the council had considered enforcement action, even though its staff were unable to gain access to the upstairs flat on seven occasions. A council spokesperson apologised for the distress and disruption caused, and said the local authority should have acted more quickly. The report found the council twice marked the job as complete without confirming whether the leak had been resolved. The resident living below repeatedly tried to send photos of the damage to the council via its repairs WhatsApp account, but it was not working. The council phoned the neighbour, received no answer and did not follow up, the watchdog said. Attempts to fix the problem were then repeatedly delayed because workers could not get into the upstairs property. Eventually, the ceiling collapsed. The watchdog said Camden Councils delays were to blame. The council said it had changed how it managed complex repairs, including bringing in specialist contractors earlier if in-house teams cannot identify the cause. Mr Blakeways report also said the affected resident had remained in temporary accommodation even by the time the watchdog finished its investigation and upheld his complaint. The council said new follow-up procedures had since been introduced to monitor people placed in temporary accommodation because of repair problems. The ombudsmans wider report also criticised several other London councils, including Ealing, Harrow, Lambeth and Tower Hamlets, along with multiple housing associations. Mr Blakeway highlighted a case involving Islington and Shoreditch Housing Association (ISHA), where it took more than three years to repair a leak in a leaseholders home. There was an eight-month gap between the initial complaint and the start of works. The watchdog said the resident was ignored while woodwork in her flat deteriorated. When ISHA did respond, it gave no explanation for the delays or when repairs would begin. The landlord initially offered to replace the rotting window and door, but later withdrew the offer and advised the resident to claim on her contents insurance. A spokesperson for ISHA said it had apologised and that the case was absolutely not the standard or experience we want for our residents. The housing association said it had since put in more resources to its repairs and surveys team along with new structures and processes.

rimmaruslan98@gmail.com

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More